 EN 388 ratings are displayed as a series of numbers and letters, with each position representing a specific mechanical protection test.

 The numbers indicate performance levels for abrasion resistance, blade cut resistance, tear resistance and puncture resistance, while the letter (A–F) represents the ISO 13997 straight-blade cut resistance test. Some gloves may also include an optional impact protection marking.

 Rather than comparing only the overall code, users should understand what each symbol represents and select gloves according to the primary hazards in their workplace.

 EN 388 includes two methods for evaluating cut resistance. The traditional Coup Test measures cut resistance using a rotating circular blade, while ISO 13997 measures the force required for a straight blade to cut through the glove material.

 ISO 13997 is especially useful for highly cut-resistant materials because it is less affected by blade wear.

 Modern cut-resistant gloves often display both results where applicable, providing a more complete understanding of glove performance.

 Not necessarily. Higher protection levels generally improve resistance against specific mechanical hazards, but they may also affect flexibility, weight or dexterity.

 The best glove is not always the one with the highest rating—it is the one that provides the right balance between protection, comfort and task performance for the intended application.

 Employers should always perform a workplace risk assessment before selecting protective gloves.

 EN 388 certified gloves are widely used wherever workers are exposed to mechanical hazards.

 Typical industries include construction, manufacturing, metal fabrication, automotive assembly, warehousing, logistics, mining, oil & gas, maintenance and general industrial work. Different applications require different combinations of abrasion, cut, tear and puncture protection.

 Selecting the correct EN 388 performance level helps improve workplace safety while maintaining productivity.